- Confirm the voting logistics as things may have changed since your best laid plans may have changed. For a successful voting process, each chapter should choose a method (online or in-person) that would work for your chapter
- A virtual election could look like this:
- GovComm recommends that you use an online method because it’s the easiest way to tally votes accurately
- Ensure online method does not reveal # of votes per candidate
- Specific recommendations on platform
- https://electionrunner.com/
- https://electionbuddy.com/
- Google Forms
- If you do use google forms be aware of future boards accessing the voting results after elections are over.
- https://www.surveymonkey.com/
- A hybrid election could look like this:
- Pre-recorded videos/zoom meeting + in person voting at a later date
- In person meeting with candidates + online voting
- Allowing both in person and online voting, then combining for a total tally.
- An in-person election could look like this:
- Speeches given at a general body meeting
- Open campaigning for a certain period + a “meet the candidates night” hosted by the Chapter
- In person voting at a supervised ballot box during another general body meeting
- Update voters on who can vote
- Prepare a list, and make available the methods to being eligible to vote
- You should make it clear in advance that only active/current members are eligible to vote.
- Or define how votes are weighed/who can vote
- Troubleshooting and not-so-rare occurrences: Make sure it’s written in the bylaws / elections procedures!
- Candidates getting elected to two positions
- You should establish ahead of time, and during the process of applications, about what you will do when a candidate gets voted in for two (2) positions since they should only accept one (1)
- Ties
- Ties mean that a re-vote has to take place.
- Runoff!
- <sarah insert how runoffs work here>
- Ranking
- This is an option, candidates rank their top three positions they are interested in, so if they get voted into more than one, they will be elected to their first choice position while the person with the second number of highest votes gets the other position.
- Speeches can be made only on first choice positions potentially
- Execute the vote!
- Tallying of the votes
- Faculty advisor double check votes
Oklahoma State University: Our chapter is medium, with about 60-80 people regularly attending general body meetings. We have used several methods for voting in the past few years including Survey Monkey, GroupMe polls and Google Forms. Since the AIAS at Oklahoma State functions as something like a student government for the School of Architecture we allow all students in the School to vote, regardless of whether they are a registered AIAS member. Since our school is fairly small and we all know each other well we are usually able to speak to the candidates before the election to determine the order in which each position will be elected based on the preferences of those who are running for more than one position; if they prefer Treasurer over Social Chair and are running for both, the Treasurer election is held first. We ask all candidates for the position for which we are currently voting to wait in the hall, then each candidate comes in to give a one-minute speech (President, VP and FBD Director candidates get two minutes). After all speeches are finished the floor is open to discussion, with each speaker getting 30 seconds to make non-biased observations about the work and involvement history of the candidates, and the discussion period ends after two minutes. When discussion is over voting opens, then the candidates are invited back in for the reveal. It’s definitely a more sensitive option to reveal the results to the candidates privately and then inform the general body of the results later on, which is probably what we’ll do from now on.
Virtual – https://www.aias.org/how-to-conduct-a-virtual-election/
University of Kansas: We have a medium-sized chapter with a handful of attendees at our meetings. Our most recent election was held virtually, so we announced the candidates at our virtual meetings, and then voted online using Google Forms. I find that using an online platform is easiest since it is the most accessible to everyone and provides more accuracy than hand-tallying votes when caution is used to ensure no one votes more than once. When it comes time to run for a position, the KU chapter allows applicants to rank their top three (3) positions which answers the question of what happens if someone is voted into two (2) positions—they will get their preferred position given that they received the most votes for that position. In addition, the KU chapter allows for only paid and active AIAS members to vote in the elections. Once all the votes are in, we forward the results to our faculty advisor who reviews the tallys, and then delivers the results back to the chapter board. From there, the board makes a formal announcement in the next chapter meeting.